Summary: The case pertains to a match for declaration and permanent injunction. The defendant available the plaintiff an oath, which the plaintiff accepted, as allowed under Article 163 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. Having said that, the defendant challenged the choice, leading to the acceptance on the appeals and remanding from the https://dominickdtcpi.ampblogs.com/what-does-affordable-permanent-injection-advocate-in-karachi-mean-69283478